Recently, I have been playing old Dr. Pierce broadcasts on Renegade. I have uploaded them to my youtube channel. Enjoy. 🙂
I was recently introduced to the Jewish mind of Tanya Cohen with the article below. This Jewess provides us with an invaluable window into the mind of our enemy. The article is pretty long, so I’m only going to keep the important stuff. For more expansive coverage of this deranged woman, read the Daily Stormer’s recent article about her, which covers a different essay of hers.
One of the most admirable things about Europe is that most (if not all) of the right-wing rhetoric that you hear in the US is explicitly against the law there. For example, attempting to link Islam with terrorism, saying that gay marriage isn’t really marriage, or saying that trans women aren’t really women would get you charged with discrimination and/or incitement to hatred.
Nobody in Europe believes that these laws interfere with their sacred, guaranteed right to freedom of speech. Rather, these laws protect freedom of speech by ensuring that it is used responsibly and for the purposes of good.
She finds it admirable that, in Europe, people lose their freedom and livelihoods while being separated from their families because they point out reality. She claims that nobody in Europe has a problem with these laws, which of course is a bold-faced lie. These laws that prohibit the expression of politically incorrect truths are only in effect for the good of the Jews, their proxies, and their collaborators, since none of the indigenous Europeans would care were it not for Jewish subversion of their traditions and culture. Far from protecting freedom of speech, what these laws are meant to do is to restrict the speech of the enemies of the Jews, their proxies and their traitorous white allies. These laws also send a clear message to the less brave section of Europe’s people: Toe the party line, or else..
In the US, however, no such laws exist. Right-wing hatemongers like Sean Hannity, Bill O’Reilly, Glenn Beck, Bill Maher, and Sarah Palin (to name just a few) are allowed to freely incite hatred and violence, oppose human rights, and undermine progress with impunity. In the United States, hate speech is often spewed forth by people with a great deal of influence, thus making it even more dangerous.
These people are Jew ass-kissing shills. I wonder, does she realize this? Is she being insincere or is she also dumb on top of being deranged? I’m guessing she’s a Jewess of the left wing lemming variety, but surely she’s aware of the true “right-wing hatemongers.” Maybe she neglects to mention those people because they aren’t as influential as these Republican Fox News jokes are. But maybe it’s because the real “right-wing hatemongers” are far more dangerous than these shills will ever be to the ideology of Cohen and she doesn’t want to draw attention to them.
…In a civilized country with basic human rights, Phil Robertson would have been taken before a government Human Rights Tribunal or Human Rights Commission and given a fine or prison sentence for the hateful and bigoted comments that he made about LGBT people. In the US, however, he was given no legal punishment, even though his comments easily had the potential to incite acts of violence against LGBT people, who already face widespread violence in the deeply homophobic American society – and his comments probably DID incite acts of violence against LGBT people.
Most countries have freedom of speech, but only in the US is “freedom of speech” so restrictive and repressive.
Calling our brand of freedom of speech “restrictive and repressive” is so Orwellian. On the contrary, we have absolutely unfettered free speech, at least for now. I wouldn’t shed any tears if subversive, anti-traditional anti-white speech was banned, or if the first admendment didn’t apply to Jews. They shouldn’t have been allowed to promote gun control, multiculturalism, integration, feminism, or sexual perversion, and if they hadn’t been allowed to say whatever they wanted through the media, that would have saved us a lot of heartbreak.
Not only is the US the only country without any laws against hateful or offensive speech, but it’s also the only country where the government cannot ban any movies, books, or video games, no matter how dangerous, demeaning to human dignity, or harmful to society they may be.
I can agree with this, but only if you apply it to how the Jews use these mediums for the promotion of pornography, race-mixing, cultural marxism, feminism, diversity, on and on, etc..
The US government is also the only government that cannot ban any groups or political parties, even when those groups or political parties pose a serious threat to democracy. This is completely incompatible with international human rights standards, which clearly state that freedom of speech does not protect speech which is harmful to society, to morality, or to human rights.
Once again, I could agree with this statement, but only if it applies to the Jews and their subversion of our culture and traditions with the help of their traitorous white collaborators.
Countries like the UK, the Netherlands, Germany, France, and Australia – to name just a few examples – take a much more sensible approach to freedom of expression. They allow legitimate freedom of expression while banning bigots, hatemongers, conspiracy theorists, anti-vaxxers, pro-pedophile groups, terrorist sympathizers, harmful media, Holocaust deniers, pick-up artists, climate change deniers, and other forms of expression which damage society and social cohesion.
The United States has a very limited and very outdated understanding of human rights and political freedoms. In all other countries, it is simply common knowledge that freedom of speech does not permit hatred…
While America has always been far behind the rest of the world when it comes to basic human rights – we still have yet to ban firearms, we still have yet to provide free higher education, and we still have yet to implement free universal healthcare, for example – the need to outlaw hate speech is one of the most basic and fundamental human rights obligations. Not only is it codified in multiple international human rights conventions, but even countries like Russia, India, Turkey, Indonesia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and Jordan – countries that most Americans consider to be “third-world” – have laws against hate speech. Why is the so-called “third-world” protecting basic human rights better than America is?
..There is absolutely nobody outside of the US who thinks that there shouldn’t be ANY laws against hate speech, racial vilification, or incitement to hatred. That idea is just unthinkable in a society where basic human rights exist. The US has a dismal record on human rights, as indicated by the fact that it still doesn’t have universal healthcare, still carries out executions, still hasn’t banned firearms, and still tortures people, to name just a few things. But having NO laws against incitement to hatred? It’s just impossible for people in civilized countries in the year 2015 to even conceive of such a thing. In fact, most people in civilized countries simply assume that the US outlaws hate speech, and they are left in stunned disbelief and disgust when they are told that it doesn’t. Inevitably, they will ask: how can the US possibly call itself a free country and a democracy when it’s the only country in the world without any kind of laws against hate speech? Protecting vulnerable minorities from hate speech is one of the cornerstones of any democratic society, and it’s one of the most basic and fundamental human rights obligations. Do Americans have no idea how ironic it is for them to call their country “the land of the free” when it doesn’t have any kind of law against hate speech?
…I grew up in Australia, which is a much more civilized and progressive country than the comparatively backwards United States, with a much deeper respect for basic human rights. Any comment which may offend, insult, humiliate, or intimidate vulnerable minorities is highlly illegal in Australia, and the Australian Human Rights Commission goes to great lengths to prosecute anyone who makes comments that offend minorities or oppose human rights. Australia’s human rights courts have ruled many times that it doesn’t matter whether the comments are “true” or “balanced” or not; if the comments may offend minorities or incite hatred, then they are against the law in Australia, as they should be. Australia has also proposed legislation (the Human Rights and Anti-Discrimination Bill) which declares people automatically guilty of offending, insulting, humiliating, or intimidating minorities unless they can prove their innocence beyond any reasonable doubt. This legislation has been wholeheartedly endorsed by the Australian Human Rights Commission and by literally every single human rights group and progressive think tank in Australia, from Amnesty International Australia to Per Capita. The Human Rights and Anti-Discrimination Bill was proposed by Australia’s centrists.
Even the most far-right ultra-libertarians in Australia still strongly agree that racial vilification and incitement to hatred (including Holocaust denial) should be against the law.
In Canada, hate speech and advocating genocide are very serious criminal offenses that can land you up to fourteen years in prison. The Supreme Court of Canada has also found that truthful statements can be classified as illegal hate speech, and that not all truthful statements must be free from restriction…. Nobody in Canada believes that laws against hate speech and advocating genocide infringe on freedom of speech….
Americans have a deep and fundamental misunderstanding of what freedom of speech is. Freedom of speech does NOT mean that you have the freedom to say anything….You don’t have the right to spout racist hate speech because that interferes with other people’s right to be free from racial discrimination….Freedom of speech does NOT give you the right to offend, to insult, to disrespect, to oppose human rights, to argue against the common good, to voice approval of totalitarian ideologies, to perpetuate toxic systems of privilege and oppression, to promote ideas which have no place in a modern democratic society, to be provocative or incendiary, or to express opinions which are unacceptable to the majority of people.
Most champions of hate speech are straight, white, Christian males who have never had to experience the devastating consequences of hate speech. These highly privileged members of society will never understand the harm that hate speech causes to vulnerable minorities. Hate speech is not “freedom” to the Muslims who face widespread attacks and abuse as a result of hate speech from outlets like Fox News and Bill Maher. Hate speech is not “freedom” to the women at abortion clinics who are shouted at by right-wing protesters just for attempting to exercise their human right to choose. Hate speech is not “freedom” to the thousands of people who are killed by guns every single year in America thanks to the gun lobby’s propaganda turning public opinion against sensible gun bans. Hate speech is certainly not “freedom” to the LGBT people who are viciously attacked and even murdered as a result of hate speech from the Christian right.
Hate speech does have very serious consequences in the real world, but straight, white, Christian men could never be able to understand just how severe those consequences can be. Privileged members of society will never know what it’s like to be a victim of hate speech. As a descendant of Holocaust survivors, I know first-hand the extreme danger that flows directly from hate speech. Those championing hate speech, however, clearly do not understand just how dangerous hate speech is. There is a hierarchy of power in society, with straight, white, Christian men firmly at the top. Freedom of speech is counter-productive if the people who benefit from it are the people who already hold far too much power and privilege in our society.
I would just like to add a hearty LOL to the statement that heterosexual, white, Christian males are “firmly at the top” of the hierarchy of power in society.
A French Jewish leader recently told the US that it needs to join the civilized world by cracking down on online hatred since hate speech on the Internet puts vulnerable minorities in very real danger (both mental and physical), but, unfortunately, we all know that his urgent pleas to the US will go completely ignored, and online hate speech from the US will continue to place French Jews and other vulnerable minorities around the world in serious danger.
Don’t be such a defeatist, Tanya. The politicians in the USA are basically falling all over themselves in their support of the fight against anti-semitism.
Until the US decides to finally cooperate with the international community, the UN and human rights groups will never be able to remove hate speech from the Internet and elsewhere. In addition to passing strong legislation against hate speech, the US needs to report to the UN and it needs to allow the UN to prosecute Americans under the UN courts. When other countries fail to press hate speech charges against their citizens, the UN often steps in and presses charges under the UN courts. In America, however, that would currently be impossible. America also needs to hand over control of the Internet to the United Nations, which will use the international human rights framework to protect human rights online, as it has repeatedly encouraged all nations to do.
This is basically the Jews’s wet dream.
….The rest of the world continues to forge ahead in human rights – Belgium recently passed human rights legislation outlawing all forms of sexist speech, and numerous countries are passing human rights laws requiring anyone accused of hate speech to prove their innocence or be declared automatically guilty….While the United States needs to strongly support freedom of speech and firmly oppose all forms of censorship, it also needs to sincerely protect vulnerable minorities from all manifestations of hate speech. There is absolutely NO excuse whatsoever for an advanced democracy in the year 2015 to not have any kind of laws against hate speech.
…..Freedom of speech has to be balanced against the feelings of others.
When freedom of speech interferes with someone else’s freedom to not be offended, insulted, disrespected, vilified, or subjected to hatred, it needs to be restricted.
If anyone in Australia ever proposed that all laws against hate speech/vilification should be completely abolished, they would lose their job, they would lose all of their friends, and they would have to hire bodyguards. That’s not even an exaggeration. Outside of the US, hate speech laws have absolutely universal support from every single facet of society. Saying that there shouldn’t be any laws against hate speech would be like saying that there shouldn’t be any laws against child abuse.
Slurs and insults are not part of the “free exchange of ideas,” so the justification for “free speech” – that all ideas should be able to be discussed – doesn’t even cover that. In fact, slurs and insults are a kind of bullying that often discourage the target’s participation in discussion and debate in the “free exchange of ideas” and, therefore, slurs and insults are actually a crude form of censorship and themselves are an attack on another person or group’s freedom of speech. Vulnerable and marginalized groups cannot speak out openly when they are constantly hounded by hateful bigots spewing toxic vitriol at them. Hate speech is itself a form of censorship, and outlawing hate speech is thus required in order to protect freedom of speech.
She has it completely backwards here. Unfortunately, too many pro-whites use racial slurs all too often, and far from bullying their targets out of defending themselves, our enemies constantly harp on our use of racial slurs so they can appear to have the moral high ground when they advocate for hate speech legislation. I honestly wish Team White would collectively stop “spewing toxic vitriol” at our country’s “vulnerable minorities” because this is why I have strangers calling me a “hateful bigot” all the time when, in reality, it is they, the feminists and the anti-racists, who are the hateful bigots.
At a time when racism, fascism, anti-Semitism, homophobia, and Islamophobia are surging in Europe, it is now more important than ever for the United States to finally fulfill its international human rights obligations and enact a law against all forms of hate speech. The fact that America still does not have a hate speech law in the year 2015 is a national embarrassment…
It’s interesting how she keeps crying about how it’s “already 2015” and the US still hasn’t silenced the pro-white anti-Jews. She keeps appealing to peoples’ desire to be trendy and fashionable. “Like, didn’t you know that free speech is sooo Two Thousand and Late? Get with the times, girl.”
So there you have it. I do think she is a liberal lemming and not a shifty, conscious subverter. The only thing that makes her a little more rabid than your average leftie is her Jewishness and all the benefits or the resources that come with it. In a perfect world, she would be living in Israel without the human right or privilege of every being allowed to leave.
Initially, I didn’t think this was going to be worth writing about, until I saw that the name of the group Google is sponsoring is called “CODE2040.” I thought, 2040 is about the year that projections claim whites will become a minority here in the States. And sure enough, the lady who runs the nonprofit organization, Laura Weidman Powers, admits that this is the exact reason why she named her organization CODE2040. Maybe 2040 is a “CODE” for White Genocide?
Just look at the cover photo and it’s caption on the nonprofit’s main page: This is the future of Tech, featuring people who “do not look like you and me.” Everything about this screams “filthy Jew(ess),” even though I can’t prove that the founder and CEO is a Jewess. But let’s look at some indicators: Firstly, she is mixed, not full black. This obviously leaves room for her to be half Jewish. Next, the name Weidman sounds Jewey enough, and it is a known Jewish name. Thirdly, this is a nonprofit organization, which also gives me Jewey vibes. Look at her current and past sponsors. With big names like Chase, Google, LinkedIn, Royal Bank of Canada, Stanford, United Negro College Fund, AOL/TechCrunch, American Express, and Silicon Valley Community Foundation, you can’t exactly call this a grassroots (aka nonJewish) organization. The icing on the cake is the recent $775k grant donated to CODE2040 by Joogle.
Also, in the video that comes with the article, she has a very Barbara Spectre-ish attitude about the future:
“Diversity is important to the tech sector because the tech sector needs innovation, it needs talent, it needs to grow, and frankly, [it needs] to survive. CODE2040 gets its name from the fact that in 2040 people of color will be the majority in the US.”
Of course, to “skeptics” of the Jewish War Against Humanity, none of this sounds like any credible evidence that she’s Jewish. That’s great if these people feel that way, because this blog is not for those people. To those of us who “get it,” this is all pretty decent evidence that she is likely a Jew. I think she is a Jew, but I can’t prove it. It’s important to point this out because we all know that the Jews That Count are out to get Whitey, and this is a perfect microcosm that represents the macrocosm. However, this would still be worth writing about even if she wasn’t Jewish herself.
The whiting out of America is already inevitable, so bringing blacks and latinos into the tech force is necessary if it is to survive, according to Powers. Maybe this is because she believes at some point, there will be no white people left to do the day to day work? Could this be because a white minority will not be allowed to work in the tech sector once the Jews That Count have accomplished their mission? Do Powers and her Jewish handlers find it necessary to prop up as many nonwhite tech companies as possible as soon as possible, while there are still white people around to lend a helping, if not suicidal, hand? Do she and her handlers find it necessary to find and prop up as many of the highest IQ blacks and latinos possible as soon as possible, in order to maintain more than a cesspool once the white race has been neutralized and/or destroyed?
I have no idea of the answers to these questions. I don’t know if it’s a conscious conspiracy or just the side effects of the general Jewish War Against Humanity. I do however feel that these questions are important to us and should be asked.
All other things being equal, meaning, in a world without Jewish Supremacism, I would not have any problems with any organization that advocates for this or that racial group. The problem is that it is politically incorrect and bordering on illegal for any groups to advocate for the white race in any manner whatsoever. This obvious double standard has fatal consequences for our people, sooner than later if we sit idly by and let these Jewish freaks have their way with the world.
Okay, all that said, let’s get to the USA Today article itself:
“There is no question that Silicon Valley is the epicenter of the tech world, and as such there’s huge opportunity for impact on inclusion in tech,” says Laura Weidman Powers, co-founder and CEO of CODE2040, who came to Austin to announce the launch of the new program at a SXSW panel Monday morning.
“However, working on diversity issues in Silicon Valley means going against the status quo,” she says. “(It means) trying to change the ratio of employees at large companies, trying to bring inclusive techniques to established hiring practices and trying to infiltrate relatively closed, powerful networks.”
That work, says Powers, is crucial in Silicon Valley because it houses the headquarters of some of the world’s most powerful tech companies, which can set an example for the rest of the tech world.
But spreading to smaller tech hubs also presents an opportunity, she says.
“Here, rather than trying to change what is, we are trying to shape what might be. In smaller tech ecosystems around the country, often the cultures and norms around talent and inclusion are not yet set. We have the opportunity to help these places bake inclusion into their DNA from the ground up,” Powers says. “It’s an opportunity to create whole ecosystems where we never see the divides we see in Silicon Valley.”
She has such a Jewish way with words. Basically, it’s too early to start forcing whites out of Silicon Valley’s work force, so the strategy is to begin forming nonwhite work forces from the ground up (of course with the bazillions of dollars given freely by her Jewish backers. Royal Bank of Canada, seriously?!) Maybe we could follow her example. Instead of trying to force all the nonwhites out of the whole United States, which, at the moment, is unacceptably bloody and basically impossible, we need to start building small white communities from the ground up.
Sooner or later, the alienated and disgruntled white techies will gladly help us, having had their livelihoods ripped from them by the Jews and the only-to-willing nonwhites. This is where we come in: day after day, year after year, producing pro white propaganda and providing all the relevant information, and making it available for the future members of our struggle who will be absolutely vital. We may not have the money that our enemies do, but we do have our enemies working a program that will radicalize key members of our struggle, free of charge!
Hey everybody, here is another huge round up of relevant pro white and antiwhite content. My goal is to add some commentary to some of the more pertinent articles. I still plan on doing that with the previous round up. I have a lot of work to do, but it is definitely my pleasure. And my duty. I also feel the need to promote everybody on Team White as much as possible. Anyway, have at it.
Mainstream Headlines/Enemy Commentary:
Tomorrow, I’ll be hosting yet another wildcard on Renegade Broadcasting. I’ve been sick since Sunday, so I haven’t had the chance to keep up with the headlines or read any good blogs. I plan on briefly covering the activism our brothers and sisters participated in on Saturday for the White Man March and covering the following interracial murders before I broadcast three more episodes of Dr. Pierce.
So, here are ten murders that the Jew owned national media will not cover because they do not care about the suffering and trauma of innocent white people. But I care. So I’m going to help break the silence. Thanks once again to Council of Conservative Citizens for doing all the actual work.
We have asked the Southern Poverty Law Center [SPLC], #BlackLivesMatters, and various other left-wing groups for examples of white on black murders for 2014 and 2015. So far we have only found four in 2014, and one in 2015.
Our 2015 sampling of black on white murders is already up to 69. (we have already documented 32 just for January of 2015)
Our 2015 sampling now includes 32 murders for January, 17 murder for February, and 20 for March.
3/18/15 – An unborn baby was killed by a black female when the mother responded to a craigslist ad in Longmont, CO. The seven month old baby was cut out of her mother’s womb and later died.
3/16/15 – Kimberly Ann Chittenden, 46, was murdered by a black male in Citrus Heights, CA.
3/13/15 – Donnie Kennedy, 31, was beaten and stabbed to death by a black male in Clarksville, TN.
3/5/15 – Yarra Wilson, 42, was murdered by her black husband in Lancaster, PA.
3/4/15 – Thomas David Oakland, 75, was killed by a black male who invaded his Gainsville, FL home.
2/27/15 – A mother and son were killed execution style when four black male invaded their Americus, GA home.
2//22/15 – Alexander William Burkart, 22, was stabbed to death by two black males while delivering pizzas in Mt. Clemens, MI.
11/24/14 – Ervin Gallas, 37, was murdered by two black males in Albuquerque, NM. The perps also wounded his nephew.
8/9/14 – James Wells was murdered by a black couple while driving a taxi cab in Hopewell, VA.
Well, at least I know I’m being effective. I’ve taken the notice of the Antifa terrorists, and have received bigoted hatemongering from their direction.
This is the price of courage, my friends. Should I cower and go under the radar because of this? No way. Like I said in my video yesterday, the enemy will claim that our activism is nothing and no big deal, yet here they are stalking us and obsessing over us. Me personally, it has never occurred to me to look up Professor Poe’s facebook, infiltrate it, and start stalking his people. That doesn’t mean that the blog is from Poe, which I doubt, because if it was him he would just openly post as himself. I also am not saying that whoever put me out like this infiltrated anyone’s facebook; I’ve always been pretty open about my identity. Never one to obsess over my privacy settings on Facebook.
No matter what happens to me, I’ll never stop advocating for my people or against our enemy. We can’t let Antifa terrorists bully us into the underground. We must have courage, and be brave. None of the hereos of our struggle have been anonymous. I’m not advocating that everyone wrecklessly give away their information like I did. I’m just saying, we need to be as courageous as possible without robbing our children of having food on the table in the process.
Here’s my video response.